Schiff Hints Mueller’s Next Indictment To Implicate Trump Team

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 13 Russian nationals earlier this month can only mean one thing according to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA): there’s more to come.

Speaking with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, Schiff – the ranking minority leader on the House Intelligence Committee, suggested that because Mueller was so extraordinarily detailed in his indictment of the 13 Russians, the Special Counsel’s office must be saving all the evidence of collusion pertaining to the DNC hack for the next indictment. 

Schiff points to the fact that there was “ample evidence” of Russia hacking the DNC, which – because Mueller didn’t include any of it in the “troll farm” indictment, obviously means things are just heating up. “And the key question there is: Is that going to involve Russian figures alone or are there going to be U.S. persons implicated as well?” posits Schiff. 

Earlier this month, Schiff told reporters at a newsmaker breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor “There is already, in my view, ample evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion if you’re willing to see it.” Schiff also said there is evidence — heard by the committee behind closed doors —that he can’t talk about publicly because it remains classified.

One thing I found striking about the indictment of these 13 Russians, aside from the fact of the extraordinary detail, and that is what is not included in the indictment. And that is the whole Russian hacking of these documents, the dumping of this information was not a part of that indictment. Now there is ample evidence for Bob Mueller to have included it. I can only conclude from the fact it was left out that Bob Mueller wants that to be part of a separate indictment. And the key question there is: Is that going to involve Russian figures alone or are there going to be U.S. persons implicated as well? –Adam Schiff

Of course, the evidence of all that Russian hacking was compiled by discredited cybersecurity firm, Crowdstrike, which was the only group allowed to analyze the hacked servers – while the FBI was told to buzz off. Perhaps Mueller’s team doesn’t feel confident using the independent report. One would think, however, that perhaps just one of the “17 intelligence agencies” which Hillary Clinton claims verified the hack could provide Mueller’s team with a little assist – or not, considering that it turns out only three agencies were involved in that assessment. 

Also, you can’t transfer files at 23 MB/s over the internet – at least not in the United States. That’s more of an “insider with a memory stick” kinda thing.

Perhaps Mueller doesn’t want to open that can of worms?

Shiff also failed to mention Mueller’s takedown of Paul Manafort and his right hand man Rick Gates on money laundering and fraud charges unrelated to the Trump campaign. Gates flipped on Manafort last week, changing his plea from not guilty to guilty on two charges; lying to Mueller’s team, and “impeding, impairing, obstructing and defeating” the DOJ and Treasury. 

Thus, it seems that Mueller having gone from indicting Trump’s campaign manager, to indicting 13 Russian internet trolls “with a shaky grasp of English and a rudimentary understanding of U.S. politics shitposting on Facebook,” doesn’t bode well for Schiff’s prediction.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2BSuLBC Tyler Durden

Bonds Rally Post-Powell-Remarks, After Biggest ETF Inflow…Ever

While its difficult to pick the bones out of the catalysts for the moves in bonds, stocks, and the dollar this morning – Powell remarks, weak DurGoods, strong inventories, weak housing, weak trade data – one thing of note is that the dollar and bonds are rallying together.

The kneejerk reaction to Powell (and the macro data-fest) was higher in yields, tagging pre-FOMC-Minutes levels, before they tumbled…

 

But as the following chart shows, the dollar and bonds are now rallying together…

 

Perhaps most notably this bond bid comes after the biggest inflow into iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF ever…

But, but, but, all the smart people said higher-rates are a no-brainer?

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2otQbxu Tyler Durden

Dalio: Central Banks Will Struggle When “Goldilocks” Ends In A Year Or Two

After flipping to a considerably more bearish view on where developed markets are in the business cycle earlier this month following the spike in average hourly wages, when he commented that everything had apparently changed in just a few days, Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio on Tuesday said during an interview with Bloomberg that central banks, most notably the Federal Reserve and ECB, will enjoy another year of two of the “goldilocks” scenario of strengthening growth and low inflation.

“We are in the Goldilocks part of the cycle, where it’s not too hot and not too cold,” he said. “We have growth and we don’t have an inflation problem. That’s the beautiful part of the cycle.”

But after that period is over, they will struggle to balance growth and inflation, adding that the US is further ahead in the economic cycle than Europe. The importance of getting policy just right during this shift will leave room for a dreaded policy error.

“Should we be concerned about inflation? I’d ask you – because it’s too low or because it’s too high? Isn’t it a funny question. There was a lot of concern that it was too low. Should we be concerned that it’s too high? We’re still struggling to get to 2%.

“In Europe is it a problem that there’s too much inflation, or too little inflation, I don’t know – you never get it perfect but it’s pretty good so I’m not concerned. What I am concerned about is, as we get into the later parts of the cycle, the challenge for central banks will be to get it perfectly.”

“When we have growth and we don’t have an inflation problem, that’s the beautiful part of the cycle. As we move into the later part of the cycle, which we’re moving toward, the breaks start to get applied.”

In Europe, Dalio expects the European Central Bank will wind down quantitative easing, but might wait to act on interest rates.

Dalio famously said during a speech at Davos in January that investors holding cash would be left “feeling pretty stupid” thanks to the combination of low inflation and strengthening growth that is creating a “just right” scenario for markets, adding that economic growth is in the late stage of the cycle, but could still continue improving for another year or two.

In a declaration that is puzzling considering Bridgewater’s massive Europe short, Dalio expressed admiration for ECB chief Mario Draghi and the European economy more generally – applauding central bankers for guiding it through a “beautiful deleveraging”. Draghi, Dalio said, should be “congratulated” for steering Europe through the financial crisis. Notably, Dalio declined to answer questions about Bridgewater’s recent $22 billion bet (it has since shrunk modestly) against some of the Continent’s biggest companies – a position that has increased from a “tiny” $700 million position in October.

As a reminder, here’s a breakdown of the companies Dalio is betting against (the number may have changed modestly):

Dalio

The European economy is coming off its best annual growth in a decade. Earlier today, Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann said the ECB could end its massive quantitative easing program – which it has been slowly tapering for a year now – by the end of 2018. He also said a rate hike in 2019 isn’t out of the question, per Reuters.

And here are Bridgewater’s biggest positions:

Chart

Of course, for all we know, Bridgewater could also have a substantial long position open in Europe via options and other alternatives to equities that regulators wouldn’t require it to disclose. Some traders have suggested that Bridgewater’s short could be part of a broader macro strategy to bet against global companies that are heavily reliant on their US business – which could be disrupted by the Trump administration’s crackdown on trade.

Earlier this month, Dalio and Bridgewater co-head of equity sales Bob Prince offered a surprisingly bearish take on market complacency, saying he expected this month’s shakeout to continue for the foreseeable future. Dalio later chimed in, writing a LinkedIn post where he declared that everything had changed in the past 10 days.

Watch the full Dalio interview below:

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EWFP3c Tyler Durden

A.M. Links: Trump Tells Governors ‘We Have to Have Action’ on Guns, Hope Hicks Faces House Intelligence Committee, German Court Clears Way for Ban on Diesel Vehicles

  • “President Donald Trump told a gathering of state governors on Monday that ‘we have to have action’ in the wake of the latest US mass shooting and urged governors not to be ‘afraid’ of challenging the National Rifle Association.”
  • White House Communications Director Hope Hicks will reportedly appear before a closed-door session of the House Intelligence Committee today.
  • Germany’s top administrative court has ruled that cities and towns may ban diesel vehicles.
  • U.N. investigators believe North Korea is shipping supplies to Syria for use in making chemical weapons.
  • Austrian public broadcasting network ORF is suing Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache, head of Austria’s far-right Freedom Party, for saying the network spreads fake news.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to sign up for Reason’s daily updates for more content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2ETmNuN
via IFTTT

Peso Coils As Mexico Prints Record-Smashing Trade Deficit

The peso can’t make its mind up as the Powell headlines, ECB comments, and US data power the dollar up and down; but the general tendency is lower as Mexico just printed a massive $4.4bn trade deficit in January – its largest ever.

Expectations were for a -$3.44bn deficit… they smashed that record…

(12 estimates ranged from $3.92bn deficit to $2.52bn deficit)

The biggest driver was a collapse in exports (down 14% MoM).

And for now, FX traders (and their favorite algos) can’t decide what to do…

This is preliminary data.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2otVkp3 Tyler Durden

Wholesale Inventories Build Most In 3 Years, Signal Q1 GDP Boost

Wholesale Inventories rose 4.5% YoY in January – the biggest annual build since June 2015 – as it appears the nation’s businesses are embracing the ‘field of dreams’ economy.

The 0.7% MoM rise in inventories is almost double expectations.

This better than expected inventory build will likely force an upside adjustment to Q1 GDP guesses (though Durable Goods disappointment may offset that).

And while we are reflecting on Q1 – is it not somewhat off-putting that inventories surged but orders tumbled in January?

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Co3Ezd Tyler Durden

Advance Data Signals Biggest US Trade Deficit In 10 Years

For the fifth month in a row, the US trade balance went deeper into deficit (if the advance data holds), hitting a larger than expected -$74.4bn in January – the biggest deficit since July 2008 (in the middle of the last recession).

Both imports and exports dropped in January:

  • Exports fell 2.2% in Jan. to $133.922b from $137.004b in the prior month

  • Imports fell 0.5% to $208.317b in Jan. from $209.263b in Dec.

But the overall picture is not pretty…

As a reminder, the trade deficit was actually at a record high ex-petroleum in December…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2FzC7tw Tyler Durden

Powell Testimony Highlights: Ignore Recent Volatility, Gradual Rate Hikes Will Continue

In advance of his first testimony before the House at 10am today, Fed Chair Jay Powell released his prepared remarks moments ago, as “some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds” and that the Fed can continue gradually raising interest rates as the outlook for growth remains strong, as and the recent bout of financial volatility shouldn’t weigh on the U.S. economy.

Commenting on Trump’s tax reform and policies, Powell said that “fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory.” He also glossed over the recent bout of volatility, “saying financial conditions remain accommodative.” At the same time, he noted that “inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.”

Of particular interest to markets will be Powell’s commentary on recent market events, which Powell is not too worried about: “After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong.

Looking forward, Powell said that “in gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis.”

Also notable is his conviction that “the economic outlook remains strong” because “the robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment.”

The Fed chair also said that “we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term,’’ and added that the lag in wages during the expansion was due to low gains in output per hour, or productivity, though a new wave of investment spending “should support higher productivity growth in time.’’

“Wages should increase at a faster pace as well,’’ Powell said, adding that the FOMC continued to view the shortfall in inflation last year “as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat.’’

Overall, a neutral commentary, one which clearly suggests that the recent market correction did not disturb the Fed, and one which hints that as long as “outlook remains strong”, rate hikes will continue…

His full testimony is below:

Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

Chairman Jerome H. Powell

Chairman Hensarling, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.

On the occasion of my first appearance before this Committee as Chairman of the Federal Reserve, I want to express my appreciation for my predecessor, Chair Janet Yellen, and her important contributions. During her term as Chair, the economy continued to strengthen and Federal Reserve policymakers began to normalize both the level of interest rates and the size of the balance sheet. Together, Chair Yellen and I have worked to ensure a smooth leadership transition and provide for continuity in monetary policy. I also want to express my appreciation for my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Finally, I want to affirm my continued support for the objectives assigned to us by the Congress–maximum employment and price stability–and for transparency about the Federal Reserve’s policies and programs. Transparency is the foundation for our accountability, and I am committed to clearly explaining what we are doing and why we are doing it. Today I will briefly discuss the current economic situation and outlook before turning to monetary policy.

Current Economic Situation and Outlook
The U.S. economy grew at a solid pace over the second half of 2017 and into this year. Monthly job gains averaged 179,000 from July through December, and payrolls rose an additional 200,000 in January. This pace of job growth was sufficient to push the unemployment rate down to 4.1 percent, about 3/4 percentage point lower than a year earlier and the lowest level since December 2000. In addition, the labor force participation rate remained roughly unchanged, on net, as it has for the past several years–that is a sign of job market strength, given that retiring baby boomers are putting downward pressure on the participation rate. Strong job gains in recent years have led to widespread reductions in unemployment across the income spectrum and for all major demographic groups. For example, the unemployment rate for adults without a high school education has fallen from about 15 percent in 2009 to 5-1/2 percent in January of this year, while the jobless rate for those with a college degree has moved down from 5 percent to 2 percent over the same period. In addition, unemployment rates for African Americans and Hispanics are now at or below rates seen before the recession, although they are still significantly above the rate for whites. Wages have continued to grow moderately, with a modest acceleration in some measures, although the extent of the pickup likely has been damped in part by the weak pace of productivity growth in recent years.

Turning from the labor market to production, inflation-adjusted gross domestic product rose at an annual rate of about 3 percent in the second half of 2017, 1 percentage point faster than its pace in the first half of the year. Economic growth in the second half was led by solid gains in consumer spending, supported by rising household incomes and wealth, and upbeat sentiment. In addition, growth in business investment stepped up sharply last year, which should support higher productivity growth in time. The housing market has continued to improve slowly. Economic activity abroad also has been solid in recent quarters, and the associated strengthening in the demand for U.S. exports has provided considerable support to our manufacturing industry.

Against this backdrop of solid growth and a strong labor market, inflation has been low and stable. In fact, inflation has continued to run below the 2 percent rate that the FOMC judges to be most consistent over the longer run with our congressional mandate. Overall consumer prices, as measured by the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE), increased 1.7 percent in the 12 months ending in December, about the same as in 2016. The core PCE price index, which excludes the prices of energy and food items and is a better indicator of future inflation, rose 1.5 percent over the same period, somewhat less than in the previous year. We continue to view some of the shortfall in inflation last year as likely reflecting transitory influences that we do not expect will repeat; consistent with this view, the monthly readings were a little higher toward the end of the year than in earlier months.

After easing substantially during 2017, financial conditions in the United States have reversed some of that easing. At this point, we do not see these developments as weighing heavily on the outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation. Indeed, the economic outlook remains strong. The robust job market should continue to support growth in household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should lead to further gains in U.S. exports, and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely continue to boost business investment. Moreover, fiscal policy is becoming more stimulative. In this environment, we anticipate that inflation on a 12-month basis will move up this year and stabilize around the FOMC’s 2 percent objective over the medium term. Wages should increase at a faster pace as well. The Committee views the near-term risks to the economic outlook as roughly balanced but will continue to monitor inflation developments closely.

Monetary Policy
I will now turn to monetary policy. The Congress has assigned us the goals of promoting maximum employment and stable prices. Over the second half of 2017, the FOMC continued to gradually reduce monetary policy accommodation. Specifically, we raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point at our December meeting, bringing the target to a range of 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 percent. In addition, in October we initiated a balance sheet normalization program to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings. That program has been proceeding smoothly. These interest rate and balance sheet actions reflect the Committee’s view that gradually reducing monetary policy accommodation will sustain a strong labor market while fostering a return of inflation to 2 percent.

In gauging the appropriate path for monetary policy over the next few years, the FOMC will continue to strike a balance between avoiding an overheated economy and bringing PCE price inflation to 2 percent on a sustained basis. While many factors shape the economic outlook, some of the headwinds the U.S. economy faced in previous years have turned into tailwinds: In particular, fiscal policy has become more stimulative and foreign demand for U.S. exports is on a firmer trajectory. Despite the recent volatility, financial conditions remain accommodative. At the same time, inflation remains below our 2 percent longer-run objective. In the FOMC’s view, further gradual increases in the federal funds rate will best promote attainment of both of our objectives. As always, the path of monetary policy will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

In evaluating the stance of monetary policy, the FOMC routinely consults monetary policy rules that connect prescriptions for the policy rate with variables associated with our mandated objectives. Personally, I find these rule prescriptions helpful. Careful judgments are required about the measurement of the variables used, as well as about the implications of the many issues these rules do not take into account. I would like to note that this Monetary Policy Report provides further discussion of monetary policy rules and their role in the Federal Reserve’s policy process, extending the analysis we introduced in July.

Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2EZzNuX Tyler Durden

Durable Goods Orders Tumble In January

Durable goods orders slumped unexpectedly in January – dropping 3.7% MoM (vs a 2.0% expected decline), and worse still, December’s bounce was revised lower as the ‘uneven-ness’ of the so-called recovery rears its ugly head once again.

The uglier picture here is that January’s plunge is not a reflection of a one-off December surge (in aircraft or defense orders) as we have seen previously.

Core durable goods orders dropped for the first time in 7 months…

Non-Defense new orders also declined MoM.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/2Cnx1BW Tyler Durden

Bob Poole on Trump’s Gas Tax, Rep. Beto O’Rourke on Challenging Ted Cruz

I'm still taking the under, but he could be a top-5 political story of 2018. ||| John Glaser/Cal Sport Media/NewscomWho loves gas-tax increases? According to preliminary reports, fans of jacking up the federal government’s share of consumer gasoline spending include but are not limited to President Donald Trump, House Transportation Committee Chairman Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Penn.), and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, among other parties not normally associated with the T-word. It’s all part of Trump’s politically wobbly infrastructure plan, whose main sticking point (though there are many) is over just how many hundreds of billions of dollars will be spent by Washington. Hence the thirst for revenue.

I will be asking about the propriety of the idea, and the long history of the gas tax, with arguably the most knowledgeable transportation policy expert in the country, the Reason Foundation’s own Robert Poole, tomorrow when I again guest-host Stand UP! with Pete Dominick on SiriusXM Insight (channel 121) from 9-12 a.m. ET. Poole has written about the subject a time or three over the years, including the recent piece, “It Is Time to Rethink the U.S. Highway Model: Our highway funding system based on per-gallon fuel taxes is breaking down for several reasons.”

Competing for Poole’s thunder will be Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), who, in addition to being that rare Democrat who successfully primaried an incumbent in part over the issue of legalizing marijuana, is now the Great Democrat Hope for unseating Sen. Ted Cruz and helping turn Texas from red to blue. (See O’Rourke’s 2013 interview with Mike Riggs, and his 2015 interview with me.) We will definitely hit up the latest in congressional immigration negotiations.

Other guests are scheduled to include Matt Kibbe, to talk about his recent Reason piece “The Tea Party Is Officially Dead. It Was Killed by Partisan Politics.,” and Gordon Chang, to talk about Xi Jinping’s power grab.

Please call in at any time, at 1-877-974-7487.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2t2nFHU
via IFTTT